monkeybarry
Nayim
If we lose Eriksen, I'd expect Maddison or Neves and a slight change in how we play.
Poch is all about Making the team bigger than its individual parts.
Poch is all about Making the team bigger than its individual parts.
If we lose Eriksen, I'd expect Maddison or Neves and a slight change in how we play.
Poch is all about Making the team bigger than its individual parts.
We should offer Eriksen some corner based incentives. 10k to clear the first defender, another 20k if he hits a team mate and another 20k if we score?
I didn't say he was the same quality.Maddison isn't anywhere near Eriksen's level - not sure if changing the way we play can make up for that yawning decline in quality.
Neves is a Gestifute client, as is 90% of that Wolves squad - we won't buy any of them for that reason. Same with any Raiola client (De Ligt, for example).
Maddison isn't anywhere near Eriksen's level - not sure if changing the way we play can make up for that yawning decline in quality.
Neves is a Gestifute client, as is 90% of that Wolves squad - we won't buy any of them for that reason. Same with any Raiola client (De Ligt, for example).
Who do you think is at Eriksens level who is attainable? In fact how many players in the world are there who is at Eriksens level in his position period?Maddison isn't anywhere near Eriksen's level - not sure if changing the way we play can make up for that yawning decline in quality.
Neves is a Gestifute client, as is 90% of that Wolves squad - we won't buy any of them for that reason. Same with any Raiola client (De Ligt, for example).
Who do you think is at Eriksens level who is attainable? In fact how many players in the world are there who is at Eriksens level in his position period?
Maddison or Neves are certainly the type of quality and age of players we would likely be in the market for - Our model has always been buying highly talented players and developing them- I dont envisage that would be changing for a while yet.....
Its what we've done time and again. Fact is there's barely anyone in the world who could replace Eriksen even if we had the financial capacity to do so, we will have to bring in someone very talented who will in all likelihood take at least a couple of seasons to get anywhere close to his level.....Eriksen wasn't Eriksen's level when we signed him.
I agree it will be development, we'll sign someone I've barely heard of for a reasonable fee who will turn out to be brilliant.
If we do end up losing Eriksen (and I will be devastated if we do) then I think we should offer Dortmund whatever it takes to try to get Sancho.
Sancho is more a Moura
He's not a playmaker is he? And surely City have got some clause to stop that?If we do end up losing Eriksen (and I will be devastated if we do) then I think we should offer Dortmund whatever it takes to try to get Sancho.
I think he will play more central as he gains experience and strength.Sancho is more a Moura like player. A tricky player rather than a playmaker
He's not a playmaker is he? And surely City have got some clause to stop that?
I would be very surprised if Emirates Marketing Project had put a clause in to stop a player going to Spurs. I think the most they would've got from the deal with Dortmund is a reasonable sell on fee, as I think the player was in quite a good position in terms of only having 6 months left on his contract when he left?He's not a playmaker is he? And surely City have got some clause to stop that?
Almost guarantee it, certainly for the new year, seeing as we tried to buy him and city blocked us, would be shocked if they didn't put in a clause to stop us using dortmund as a middle man
However he would cost £70 and
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.