I agree totally. The thing is Eriksen has not indicated he does not want to move, on the contrary at the beginning of the summer, indeed some rumours say before the CL final, he actually told management it was time to move on. The problem with Eriksen is not that he does not want to move but rather there has not been a bid for him.
If you want to follow that particular rabbit down the hole, it was reported that he wanted to move only to a specific couple of clubs, which drastically limits our market for him, doesnt it?
He also said he would be happy to stay if not. Presumably to see out his contract and move on an even bigger payday in the summer (pre contract in Jan?)
So, again, even though he has indicated a willingness to move on - its still not a simple thing to sell him.
Theoretically you are indeed correct. But in this instance we are not talking about a player like Winston Bogarde or even Gareth Bale, players earning at the peak of their career. I am pretty sure that last summer if we made Eriksen available for transfer he would have jump at a move to a bigger club where he could treble his wages and win trophies.
What if he had the foresight to wait a year, then quadruple his wages and get a £10m signing on bonus? Are you still sure he would have jumped at leaving?
Have a look at the Rabiot drama, and alleged demands, as an example.
We spent two years trying to sign him but he was determined to move on a free, and even then he priced himself out of moves.
If I were chairman my plan A would have been to try and renew his contract at a higher rate and more regular. Correct me if I am wrong but unlike Kane and Dele, Eriksen has only signed one new contract since he joined us. I think the financial gulf in wages between him and Kane has not helped the situation. If however he did not want to sign a new contract as chairman I would have considered selling him last summer not two years ago.
And let me clarify, as a fan I could not give a rats arse whether he goes on a free or not.
Plan A is EXACTLY what Levy does. Has done for years.
Problem with plan A is that it takes two to tango, and the other party needs to be willing to engage and sign. As per your example, clearly Kane and Dele are, and Eriksen never really has been.
And the crux is still, you would rather sell our best player (or one of our best) years ahead of time through fear of losing him.
You would write off having him perform for you, and write off the potential to have that time to get him to sign a deal, just on the off chance he isnt convinced at that point?
I strongly disagree with that approach.
I presume we are still talking about Eriksen right? Do you have any evidence to suggest Eriksen decided to see out his contract last summer? I only ask as he recently indicated that he is ready for a change
I was speaking in general, not specifically Eriksen.
That said, it appears all season that he had no intention of even sitting with us to discuss, so yes - I think its entirely possible he did decide a year ago he was done. Knowing full well this summer we would be forced to let him go cheaper - on the proviso one of his preferred clubs comes in for him.
Allegedly he already has an agreement in place with Madrid should they go for him.
I think it suggests this isnt a spontaneous thing.