• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ENIC

Glenda's Legs said:
But then they need to agree what they are happy to concede on from that menu. Would they take higher ticket prices in order to keep OAP concessions, for example? And because they are not negotiating on behalf of the whole fanbase, how do they decide what can be given up? And because of the nature of the movement they can hardly keep their strategy secret. If the club say ok we will reinstate the OAP concession but everyone else has to take the hit via a price increase, or, we’ll lower the cut off for the Young Adult concession instead, is that acceptable?
All somewhat hypothetical of course as they are not in a position to negotiate with the club anyway but I don’t think they want a negotiation, they simply have a list of things they want to be done differently. Not saying that’s wrong but they have no leverage other than making noise.
Click to expand...

I agree it's a large list and that could because the people formulating it may not have much experience in negotiating. It's hard for me to understand how anyone can make demands in situations like this without a large majority of "the fans" being with them and having the same aims.

I as a pensioner do not feel entitled to a discount but do believe it should be for kids, branding means little to me, but I could foresee it leading to advertising signing all over the stadium, I certainly don't like creating "an atmosphere" it's not Disneyland let the team performance create it.

I certainly cannot see how we as supporters have a say in how the club is run on the commercial (non football) side or be expected to be consulted.
 
That letter although well structured in parts seems also slightly over self serving. For me the ROTS and flags don't rep all fan beliefs so I would argue why would the club concede on them points when other fans might hold a different view.

As someone else said....maybe pick a battle or less battles
 
K.D.D.D.D.Soc said:
I may not agree with some of the points but that's a better way of addressing issues, it does appear to be aimed at THST and their meetings with the club rather than the banners and chants against ENIC and Levy which appears to be the way they wish to be portrayed.
Click to expand...

Good to have a few points that are clear to see (agree or not)

The issue remains the childish/immature focus on Levy, you can request pressure for change in board/ownership if over time agreed commitments aren't meant. There is zero need to name Levy by name because you make it personal when the goal isn't personal.
 
Qatar wanting a piece of the action sounds realistic, Saudi and UAE own clubs here so they won't want to miss out and France just doesn't have a competitive league. I don't think a high purchase price would put them off given all the infrastructure that's in place now and our PSR must be attracted to them.
 
P.D. said:
Qatar wanting a piece of the action sounds realistic, Saudi and UAE own clubs here so they won't want to miss out and France just doesn't have a competitive league. I don't think a high purchase price would put them off given all the infrastructure that's in place now and our PSR must be attracted to them.
Click to expand...

I do wonder why we seemed to go in reverse last summer in buying only one clear 'first-team' level player....lower wages ratio probably adds to the attraction for any sale, as it gives new owners a broader canvass to 'invest' and 'grow' the team on their terms..
 
P.D. said:
Qatar wanting a piece of the action sounds realistic, Saudi and UAE own clubs here so they won't want to miss out and France just doesn't have a competitive league. I don't think a high purchase price would put them off given all the infrastructure that's in place now and our PSR must be attracted to them.
Click to expand...

Also psg's ceo is under investigation in france. Dazn hasn't paid the league the tv money and the qataris were caught bribing euro mp's.
 
Grays_1890 said:
Yeh but I cant remember there being sponsor branding on my seat........sorry if I am being confusing.......I just don't get it.
Click to expand...

Picture in the article. Players seats.

www.espn.co.uk

Sources: INEOS in talks to end Spurs sponsorship

Manchester United's co-owners INEOS are in talks with Tottenham to end their sponsorship agreement with the club earlier than planned, sources have told ESPN.
www.espn.co.uk www.espn.co.uk
 
Lilbaz said:
Picture in the article. Players seats.

www.espn.co.uk

Sources: INEOS in talks to end Spurs sponsorship

Manchester United's co-owners INEOS are in talks with Tottenham to end their sponsorship agreement with the club earlier than planned, sources have told ESPN.
www.espn.co.uk www.espn.co.uk
Click to expand...
OK cool. Get it

So the out cry is that sponsored seats are sponsored not Joe public seats, which is where I was confused.

Which brings me to the point that whilst people moan the stadium is not sponsored, they also moan the heated player seats are sponsored sponsored.

I get people want THFC on the seats wider when the stadium is empty, but this fanbase seems massively confused about its arguments IMO

As Glenda (I think) said pick a lane people
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back