• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

ENIC

@SpiderSpurs - you disagree with my comment which is fair enough, it was intentionally facetious. But if CFT cannot see that pushing for the club to change its policies/approach to transfers, wages, ticket pricing, concessions etc whilst at the same time aligning their movement with those who are calling for the very people CFT need to convince about the changes to get out of the club, then I think it’s fair to question their capacity to think logically.
 
@SpiderSpurs - you disagree with my comment which is fair enough, it was intentionally facetious. But if CFT cannot see that pushing for the club to change its policies/approach to transfers, wages, ticket pricing, concessions etc whilst at the same time aligning their movement with those who are calling for the very people CFT need to convince about the changes to get out of the club, then I think it’s fair to question their capacity to think logically.
I think the club could spend more money on transfers (which they have anyway), spend a larger percentage on wages, reduce ticket prices, keep concessions, reduce food prices (obviously those actions are in conflict with one another)...and we'd still end up with endless moaning and blaming if the results aren't good. The monetary thing doesn't trump the emotional thing.
Hence the state of the discussion...born out of emotional anguish, never a good starting point for a grown up discussion.
 
I think the club could spend more money on transfers (which they have anyway), spend a larger percentage on wages, reduce ticket prices, keep concessions, reduce food prices (obviously those actions are in conflict with one another)...and we'd still end up with endless moaning and blaming if the results aren't good. The monetary thing doesn't trump the emotional thing.
Hence the state of the discussion...born out of emotional anguish, never a good starting point for a grown up discussion.
You mean they have grown members on there. :D
 
A week or two ago I ran out of podcasts and tried a different Spurs pod.
They had Billie T on, talking to a lady host about CFT.
I was taken aback at how poorly their aims were articulated, and how poorly thought through it all was.
The logic didnt follow and they had no visible solution, just "change Levy".
He came across as rather dimwitted; the host even moreso.
 
A week or two ago I ran out of podcasts and tried a different Spurs pod.
They had Billie T on, talking to a lady host about CFT.
I was taken aback at how poorly their aims were articulated, and how poorly thought through it all was.
The logic didnt follow and they had no visible solution, just "change Levy".
He came across as rather dimwitted; the host even moreso.
Some of it, maybe unfairly from my part, some of it seems abit like a bunch of people have got together and no one knows whats the loudest thing to shout about, so it all just becomes noisy
 
Some of it, maybe unfairly from my part, some of it seems abit like a bunch of people have got together and no one knows whats the loudest thing to shout about, so it all just becomes noisy

I think they know there's a wide range of varying complaints among the fanbase and they're trying to cover all bases.
 
A week or two ago I ran out of podcasts and tried a different Spurs pod.
They had Billie T on, talking to a lady host about CFT.
I was taken aback at how poorly their aims were articulated, and how poorly thought through it all was.
The logic didnt follow and they had no visible solution, just "change Levy".
He came across as rather dimwitted; the host even moreso.
What was the pod?
 
@SpiderSpurs - you disagree with my comment which is fair enough, it was intentionally facetious. But if CFT cannot see that pushing for the club to change its policies/approach to transfers, wages, ticket pricing, concessions etc whilst at the same time aligning their movement with those who are calling for the very people CFT need to convince about the changes to get out of the club, then I think it’s fair to question their capacity to think logically.
So you've contacted them directly to get answers to your queries? That would be logical, no?
 
A week or two ago I ran out of podcasts and tried a different Spurs pod.
They had Billie T on, talking to a lady host about CFT.
I was taken aback at how poorly their aims were articulated, and how poorly thought through it all was.
The logic didnt follow and they had no visible solution, just "change Levy".
He came across as rather dimwitted; the host even moreso.
It’s my bug bear
Said it before and spideman and batbrick didn’t like it
It’s basically Brexit
 
What was the pod?
I'm not sure, I had a search and I think it was this one below
I take back my comment that Billie T sounded dimwitted, it is the guest "Lauren" who sounds dimwitted.
The CFT talk starts at 10 minutes til 15 minutes then meanders around and comes back around 27 minutes.
Their stated aim seems to simply be that "they distanced themselves from the ENIC OUT crazies of times past" and just want change for Tottenham.

That is it. Change. No explanation of what it means.

 
I'm not sure, I had a search and I think it was this one below
I take back my comment that Billie T sounded dimwitted, it is the guest "Lauren" who sounds dimwitted.
The CFT talk starts at 10 minutes til 15 minutes then meanders around and comes back around 27 minutes.
Their stated aim seems to simply be that "they distanced themselves from the ENIC OUT crazies of times past" and just want change for Tottenham.

That is it. Change. No explanation of what it means.

That's a new one on me, hadn't heard of it.

Will give it a listen, cheers 👍
 
Back