I don't study other teams, but if de Gea is better than Lloris, he can't be human.The Telegraph rates Hugo as the second best keeper in the Prem so far this season (De Gea being first).
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football...er-league-goalkeepers-season-far/hugo-lloris/
I don't study other teams, but if de Gea is better than Lloris, he can't be human.
We have been so lucky with Hugo. General consensus is we only got him because none of the 'big' clubs needed a keeper at the time. He came in without a bedding in period (ignore AVB's brick man management), and has been consistently good from the word go (not necessarily normal for someone new to the PL). I can't think of a bad game he's had for us, and the only criticism levelled at him is his kicking (he's no Bravo lol). He's been professional, loyal, a leader, and an outstanding servant to the club. I fudging love him. Salut, Monsieur Lloris!He is human
He just isn't as Hugo
They play a defensive long ball system yet let in a lot more goals than us
Yes his saves are flashy and yes he is a very good keeper but he simply isn't as good
I don't study other teams, but if de Gea is better than Lloris, he can't be human.
I don't agree Lloris looked bad under AVB, and he's not only about rushing off his line. Strange comment IMO.How you rate a player is first of all based on personal opinion.
Second, a goalkeeper is very much affected by how the team and outfield player are playing, more any other position I woud say. Like the old days of AVB, Hugo had many critics, but one the reason why he looked not as good as today, was that AVB didn't have the (defensive) players for the kind of game he wanted to play.
Or, if someone requested Hugo to stay on the line all the time, he would, most likely, looks like an ordinary keeper.
I don't agree Lloris looked bad under AVB, and he's not only about rushing off his line. Strange comment IMO.
Just because you disagree, it dosen't mean that it was strange. He had a lot of critics at that time, valid or not depends on how you look at it. One thing is for sure, Hugo had to pick the ball out of the net many times those years and we had some awfuls results and the goalies main misson is to stop the ball from passing the line.
Brad was quite obviously the back up, and would've accepted being benched. It was just a silly ego trip by AVB showing who's boss - good way to tinkle off one of your most important players.he wasn't benched, Friedel was the incumbent, Lloris had to win the spot
his kicking caused a lot of trouble early on as i recall, a problem exacerbated by the high line we played at the time
Brad was quite obviously the back up, and would've accepted being benched. It was just a silly ego trip by AVB showing who's boss - good way to tinkle off one of your most important players.
True, but Brad was aging and was signed as a number two, Lloris was coming in as one of our best players of international standing, so it was inevitable he would be our number one. I don't remember Brad having a bad game, so it's not like he got dropped because of that, and all a bit silly IMO. The only thing to gain was tinkling off Lloris.there wasn't much between the performances early on iirc, Brad had excelled in the previous season and had earned the chance to fight to keep his place imo
True, but Brad was aging and was signed as a number two, Lloris was coming in as one of our best players of international standing, so it was inevitable he would be our number one. I don't remember Brad having a bad game, so it's not like he got dropped because of that, and all a bit silly IMO. The only thing to gain was tinkling off Lloris.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.