Okay i am just going to start out by saying i like lamela and think he is one of the more naturally gifted / talented players in our team. And a hard worker...he is just low on confidence and this is affecting his develpoment
i personally think you are downgrading everyone that has played effectively as part of a team and contributed significantly to their teams output in this league that have played on the flank. By saying that there are very few people that can do that and only the exceptional ones are capable of doing that i think is misleading and it sort of sets up a bit of a straw man effect that makes it seem that people shouldnt expect their flank men to be effective in our league. Our league is known, and we should take pride in this, for not giving anyone , foreign or local, space and time. yet quite a few get on with it and play well
i wouldnt disagree with your conclusion about sigurdsson, but i will add that he was poorly utilised by us, plus if you look at sigurdsson at swansea...he is still actually playing the same game that he played with us but just with more responsibility and focus. As a squad player it was silly to sell him, but as a first team impact player i think the choice was right....if we are to get to 'THAT' level and he is not happy being rotated in a squad capacity then its his career choice to move.
We'll just have to agree to disagree on this. I really didn't think what I said would be contentious. We've seen many players for us flourish with a bit of space and movement around them and struggle immensely when not given the rights service and movement. We've seen the same with so many players at so many teams. I barely even know what it is your point is to be honest. Are you saying that there are many players in the Premier League that do well without space and movement around them? In what way? Why aren't these players consistently scoring and getting assists then?
Swansea are using Sigurdsson better. By getting the ball to him in space and getting movement around him.
As for time and space being an all or nothing combination of ingredients......sure i agree. why wouldnt i? nothing singular in football operates on its own in a vacuum, but i tend to focus on the points the poster is making...time and space is what was trending so i stuck to that if you get my meaning.
I disagree with the picture i felt your post was painting , in that if denied time and space then you would likely look like lamela has looked for us. i dont agree with that...james milner has looked effective in EVERY SINGLE team he has played for in every position people have put him in. this boy has little speed and little tricks up his sleeve...he has played for the best teams and a couple of dire ones yet his intelligence, his decision making , his ball utilisation skill and his movement have all been clear to see if you are willing to look.
I can only say that if that was the picture my post painted it was not the picture I intended to paint. And I think I made that clear in my first response to you.
I mentioned Sig because I think there are similarities between why he didn't make it at Spurs and why Lamela is struggling.
James Milner is a very good player, not top notch, but very good. Rightly an important squad player for a top club, would probably (like Barry) be more outstanding at a club lower down the table like he was at Villa. He's still someone who needs space and time for me. Although his contribution off the ball often makes up for it compared to some players at least.
I can only put that down to your ignorance of bolasie and a couple of people that have been vocal about him for some time (i am not one of them by the way). This season though i have been much more aware of him and what he offers. I dont think he is an amazing player overall...but i think he is an impactful one and one that stands out..primarily for his on ball antics and the fact that he isnt afraid to try and take the game over. If i had to choose between a lamela TYPE or Bolasie TYPE...i would chose lamela's TYPE all the time.
And yet despite the knock down bolasie is given by you, as i felt you generically put a lot of wide players from your previous comment, he is more effective and commanding and more of a contributor in games for his team than lamela is for ours.
Crystal palace outplayed us. Simple. Bolasie outplayed lamela. Simple. Yet we have the players with better marketed pedigree than palace. You partially stripping Bolasie down just makes me, cant speak for others, respond with "lamela was worse in that game and less use than bolasie was"
yes
1) there is , cause there was ample time we closed him out and he released the ball and moved again to retrieve it in space to do what he likes to
2) Bolasie is an impact player, almost likes to operate in isolation and on an island. so movement from his team, creating space for bolasie to work with aside and an option to receive a pass, is less of a necessity for him to do his thing and shine.
3) he has done it against most of the teams he has played against, so it isnt a one off. people have taken notice of his consistency this year
maybe a bolasie watch today? dont know who they are playing but we can see how he fares with his less 'perceived' talented team and how lamela fares against said team when we next play them
Did you have a chance to watch Bolasie yesterday? I didn't unfortunately.
It might be that I'm wrong about him. I'm wrong quite often. I don't see Bolasie as someone who will be consistent and do well at a big team, but could be that he could/will.
He was better than Lamela in that game. We were second best overall, he was one of their best players and Lamela was one of our worst.
End of the day , i like lamela, i think he is talented and i think he has much more to offer..and i think he will. I just dont agree with the tactic of smearing or downsizing others and the situation to make it seem like he is doing more / better than okay and that he is acheiving his targets. Its a bloody low bar if what he is giving us now is what we should be expecting from him
Smearing? This is what I said:
"I would rather say very few attacking players make it England or elsewhere if not given space and movement around them.
There are exceptional players capable of producing magic on their own, but they're very few. And even those players are better with space and movement."
I honestly don't get how this paints the picture you're talking about.
I've been saying for pages and pages that what I want is for some patience and for Lamela to be given time. I've been critical of him. I've not said that he's achieving his targets! Please point me to what I've said that makes you claim that this is what I'm saying.
All I'm saying is that he's talented and should be given more than 15 league starts to develop that talent at Spurs. I think he deserves it given his obvious hard work and attitude, and I think it's the best option for the club.