i think he had more space, he had more of the ball, and he seemed to understand his teammates movements a bit more.
Crazy not to play him today. It could set him back to square one. Worried !
i could have sworn we had this discussion a few months back and you made it seem like there were more than a few that could do it. which i obviously disagreed with...it could have been someone else but my spidey sense is tingling
that means that previously when he played crap or average then that was all him and just in game circumstances and nothing to do with adaptation to surroundings or his confidence.
and i'm not 12 btw, i dont believe sound bites from the media. i leave that to people that the papers and marketing departments aim / focus their energy on.
example terry, prior to the lip read, said he didnt call anton anything. harry redknapp says he cant read. it made the papers...it must be true.
not saying this is a lie , just that a clipping wont sway visual evidence.
an example of a mentally strong mind is sandro and another one is oscar.......both have actually gotten better but from the moment they started they were involved , constantly on the go and never seemed to shirk under the competition. rooney is another
you can tell a mentally tough mind when you see one. i havent seen that yet in lamela...in fact i saw the opposite
which is why i think he should be introduced...not thrown into games that matter from the start. let him ride his confidence in a scenario that he can help without feeling the weight of it all. can you imagine the amount of pressure if this POSSIBLY long term PROJECT has to go out there from the start and every touch of his the whole fans are watching waiting for him to be the messiah off the back of what he did to some back water team from moldova? people like you could set him back
his confidence is clearly higher than it was previously.....treat it like a condition and nurse it to full health
but they actually did
chadli, paulinho and even soldado and erkisen all try to do what they do. they will get better but even when it didnt work out they all still play their own actual game
i'm suprised that you have paulinho in there as he has pretty much been one of the players of the season? chadli has actually been playing well and solid..isnt he injured?
we all know why soldado isnt being this scoring machine...something that ****es me off with both coaching and scouting staff...someone needs to answer for whats happening with him
Crazy not to play him today. It could set him back to square one. Worried !
i'm not sure if you're saying yes or no to the question
so you dont think it was a confidence issue then before? you just think he played badly / average in those games
jeez wow, even i thought he was having a crisis of the soul.
give the kid a bit of rope to escape....maybe a language barrier then? cause if your saying that those performances were just him playing his game to the level he can on that given night......i shudder to think what that means
and one of the things i liked about him from the beginning was his ability to find space on the field. i dont think that was a problem for him..and it shouldnt be too much i would hope cause the premiership doesnt allow space for free
you cant be serious. he played his best 90 mins in a spurs shirt.......after a string of sub par performances and you want to start him straight away?
why not bring him on at half time or at 60 minutes?
Could very well have been me. I think we have players capable of doing that in Paulinho, Capoue, Vertonghen, Vlad, (previously BAE), potentially Eriksen and Sig as well as Chadli. They haven't so far though, part of my point about this moment in time compared to a line-up being potentially good in the future.
Can you clarify how his quote about his price tag not hindering him settling in means that he doesn't have to settle in or adapt to his surroundings? To me he is saying that his price tag is not hindering him settling in, but that he still needs to adjust, adapt, get used to the league, the country and the team. Just that he doesn't see the price tag as a big part of that challenge as he's successfully dealt with this before.
He seems tough enough to me. Always looking for the ball, looking to play a creative forward pass, hasn't let his head drop by the lack of game time or things not always going his way on the pitch. Gets fouled quite a bit, but just gets up again and keeps playing. Was clearly fouled in the area in the first half against Sheriff, should have had a pen, but didn't get it. Would have been easy for him to let that frustrate him as once again things weren't going his way. He didn't though, just kept going, kept looking for the ball and the pass
AS our alternatives in the AM position are 2 players that have produced next to nothing for a while. You don't think it would be an ideal game to start him?
you said he was fragile mentally....i dont think that was the right thing to say. Crisis of the soul???
no not the new country...the league and physicality of it and the pace...some people take that on in their stride and it doesnt phase their performance or what they attempt to do even if it doesnt work out. others shirk and just curb inward and play cautious and are careful with most things they do
you're telling me that you didnt think that lamela had a confidence issue until his recent game against moldova?
no the bold part isnt to do with his adapting to the league. i'm actually ignoring the price tag comment and just focusing on the idea that indianspur is saying that what we have seen bar the sherriff game is the best he could offer us given those circumstances in-game. essentially that there is nothing mental stopping him from doing what he allegedly could do for fun
notice how some young players need time to adapt and its a roll of the dice how they come out the other end and others just get the **** done like professionals from the off.
it seemed to me that lamela was playing within himself.......i even said so as much after the first game,,...he played a safe efficient and solid team game and would grow from that..but the idea that what he did there was what he is all about doesnt seem true to me...certain players even when they are adpating still play their game..coutinho for instance
lamela doesnt seemed to have been playing his game..and infact to a degree his performances actually got worse. the sheriff game was actually the anomaly since he has arrived in the trend. i chose to believe it was a confidence issue
I was under the impression that your post was regarding the bolded bit in the post you quoted.
Obviously confidence will play a big part for young players. No doubting that. Just not sure how much you can read into someone's mental toughness based on a short run of games where that player may or may not be confident and is still adapting to the country, league and team.
I really don't understand why you picked Coutinho as your example considering that he flopped in Italy.
I don't think Lamela has been playing "within himself" as such, he's been looking for the ball, he's been trying to make things happen. He's been playing his game as you say it.
Way to kill the momentum Andre.
yes indeed
i dont think the chiriches injury helped though
its funny you say he flooped in italy, yet when he came here he probably played the same game he plays in italy and anywhere else whether it came off or not
IF you are saying that lamela has been playing his game and what we have seen so far is what he is about then based on that comment alone....taking nothing else into account, but just yuour comment...i wouldnt rate highly at all.
i'm more than leaning towards the nerves aspect , as indianspur clarified, and confidence issue that would hinder an alleged super talent from actually demonstrating the areas that make him a super talent. the alternative doesnt bear thinking about
Oh come there was no reason to put on Defoe other than to stop all the idiots in media afterwards wondering why he doesnt put on Defoe.
Agreed. This game in the last 30 mjns was crying for someone like Lamela.
And we put on JD. Did he even do anything.