Yesterday I said Lamela should have started, and surprise, surprise we looked a much better team when he and Lo Celso came on in the second half
3 games running now that double sub has turned the play in our favor, i suppose you have to consider it has been when chasing the game and so obviously a little more urgency in general helps also
Who do you bring in to replace him at the 60 minute mark though, Eriksen, Winks, Skipp?
The bonus of them being used as impact subs is that we can use lots of energy as a team being solid for the first 60 and then they can give the team a bit of a breather while they go mad chasing, harrying and attacking.
He needs to not be selfish. He works hard for the team but a couple of times yesterday he tried to do too much instead of passing. I like to think that he’s doing it for the team, fired up to get the team back in the match but he needs to learn when to pass and when to go solo. Perhaps selfish isn’t the right word, and instead to make better decisions.
We should start him and take him off at 60 minutes
Sent from my SM-G975F using glory-glory.co.uk mobile app
Both Lamela and Lo Celso are options to start, if not both definitely at least one of them
GLC more likely, Reggie Lamela is a good sub!
Are you insinuating that no matter how well he plays he will never be more than a sub for us? That attitude will do little to inspire 27 year old
His hips are made of crystalWhy the fukk do we have to take him off on 60 minutes, particularly if he is playing well?