Well its no different to Spurs really is it? Had good times getting to semis and finals with Poch, but couldn't get it over the line. So go for a change of direction and 'proven winners' in Jose and Conte and we are worse off. So here we are, back where we started trying to develop a young energetic team with a front foot manager again. Sometimes you don't appreciate what you had until some time afterwards - England's tournament results have never come close to being this good, and perhaps a different manager will get the team playing more attractive football but I'd wager we don't come as close to winning anything and if we don't regardless of the football, he will only be given so long before the 'It's time he won something narrative' begins because we have our 75th edition of the 'golden generation'.This is not a snarky comment but an honest question... If Southgate stayed on and continued this form of maybe semifinal, final, quarters, beating all the lower ranked sides and maybe coming up short in the big games, but continued going deep in tournaments, Would you be happy/more than happy, satisfied with that? Or would there be a point when you could imagine getting frustrated?
That's an honest question, no right or wrong answers etc. Should we just chill out and accept that going deep is actually an achievement in itself and that not embarrassing ourselves like previous managers have makes it worth it, or should we take a risk and go through another 2 or 3 coaches and more than likely suffer some up and downs again trying to find a winning formula?
For the pro Southgate fans what do you think...?
Well its no different to Spurs really is it? Had good times getting to semis and finals with Poch, but couldn't get it over the line. So go for a change of direction and 'proven winners' in Jose and Conte and we are worse off. So here we are, back where we started trying to develop a young energetic team with a front foot manager again. Sometimes you don't appreciate what you had until some time afterwards - England's tournament results have never come close to being this good, and perhaps a different manager will get the team playing more attractive football but I'd wager we don't come as close to winning anything and if we don't regardless of the football, he will only be given so long before the 'It's time he won something narrative' begins because we have our 75th edition of the 'golden generation'.
As a side note have heard people talking about Klopp/Poch/Howe but the quality of international managers is pretty low and for managers in their prime its not really of interest and I would be shocked if it was any one of them....
What a great job he did.
My feelings mirror what I felt at the time when Jose and Conte got fired, I just want to enjoy the games again. Football is about enjoyment and whilst Southgate achieved better results than any England manager since 1966, the football was pretty dire to watch. It would be a lot different had we won the euros, I think almost everyone would want him to stay. He’s done a good job but I don’t think he’s done anything extraordinary or that other managers could have done, I’m not saying anyone could have done it, but there are better managers out there IMO. We don’t have any divine right to win anything but with the players we have, we’re in with a shout of winning things and we would absolutely be one of the favourites for the next World Cup along with Spain, Germany, Argentina etc. anything can happen in knockout football, I accept we could bring in a new manager and go out in the group stages, my only mandate is I want to enjoy the football.
Whilst I agree there is better managers out there, those that actually want to be in international football? The quality is low, there is no great desire for the very good/great club managers to manage internationally until the twilight years of their career in general. Keep hearing the 'this is nothing no other manager should have done' because of the players at his disposal, so why haven't they? Football management is about a lot more than just playing the game on paper, especially at international level for a team like England where there are egos everywhere. Eriksen and Capello had a better squad of players than we do now, why couldn't they manage a semi final in a tournament between them? It's just the same shhhhh different day when it comes to England fans talking about an England manager and how all of us know what we should be doing that apparently every England manager doesn't.My feelings mirror what I felt at the time when Jose and Conte got fired, I just want to enjoy the games again. Football is about enjoyment and whilst Southgate achieved better results than any England manager since 1966, the football was pretty dire to watch. It would be a lot different had we won the euros, I think almost everyone would want him to stay. He’s done a good job but I don’t think he’s done anything extraordinary or that other managers could have done, I’m not saying anyone could have done it, but there are better managers out there IMO. We don’t have any divine right to win anything but with the players we have, we’re in with a shout of winning things and we would absolutely be one of the favourites for the next World Cup along with Spain, Germany, Argentina etc. anything can happen in knockout football, I accept we could bring in a new manager and go out in the group stages, my only mandate is I want to enjoy the football.
They just said on the radio that they believe Eddie Howe would be open to an offer should it come his way
They just said on the radio that they believe Eddie Howe would be open to an offer should it come his way
Whilst I agree there is better managers out there, those that actually want to be in international football? The quality is low, there is no great desire for the very good/great club managers to manage internationally until the twilight years of their career in general. Keep hearing the 'this is nothing no other manager should have done' because of the players at his disposal, so why haven't they? Football management is about a lot more than just playing the game on paper, especially at international level for a team like England where there are egos everywhere. Eriksen and Capello had a better squad of players than we do now, why couldn't they manage a semi final in a tournament between them? It's just the same shhhhh different day when it comes to England fans talking about an England manager and how all of us know what we should be doing that apparently every England manager doesn't.
Our fans as a general rule over rate our squad, it is decent with a sprinkling of very good but nothing particularly special that has other big nations fearing us. Bellingham we talk up so much when he still has much developing to do - right now he looks like a more marketable version of prime Dele, he comes up with some special moments but isn't 'world class' which I've seen many label him as. If we ever get to a semi final that is a job well done, but to do it so consistently in knock out football is extremely good going - of course, winning one is the ultimate hurdle but we have been consistently knocking at the door which we haven't before, and is no easy task no matter who you are.
Agree, would be great to watch England playing with a real verve but like I said this parallels Spurs and what was being said when Ange took over how we just want to enjoy watching our club play and for a couple of years people will continue to go along with that. But there will be a point when the majority will no longer just be accepting of decent football, and will start demanding trophies again....
Whilst I agree there is better managers out there, those that actually want to be in international football? The quality is low, there is no great desire for the very good/great club managers to manage internationally until the twilight years of their career in general. Keep hearing the 'this is nothing no other manager should have done' because of the players at his disposal, so why haven't they? Football management is about a lot more than just playing the game on paper, especially at international level for a team like England where there are egos everywhere. Eriksen and Capello had a better squad of players than we do now, why couldn't they manage a semi final in a tournament between them? It's just the same shhhhh different day when it comes to England fans talking about an England manager and how all of us know what we should be doing that apparently every England manager doesn't.
Our fans as a general rule over rate our squad, it is decent with a sprinkling of very good but nothing particularly special that has other big nations fearing us. Bellingham we talk up so much when he still has much developing to do - right now he looks like a more marketable version of prime Dele, he comes up with some special moments but isn't 'world class' which I've seen many label him as. If we ever get to a semi final that is a job well done, but to do it so consistently in knock out football is extremely good going - of course, winning one is the ultimate hurdle but we have been consistently knocking at the door which we haven't before, and is no easy task no matter who you are.
Agree, would be great to watch England playing with a real verve but like I said this parallels Spurs and what was being said when Ange took over how we just want to enjoy watching our club play and for a couple of years people will continue to go along with that. But there will be a point when the majority will no longer just be accepting of decent football, and will start demanding trophies again....
The obvious solution is to appoint both Gerrard and Lampard as England managers.
I agree with alot of this BUT the overhyping of players does not explain away the fact we didn't play any of them in their desired or more effective role in the tournament, heck we were experimenting with TAA in midfield into the second game. I am ok with a better Dele Alli (an analogy I agree with BTW) but then you have to play a system and style that benefits both him and for that matter Kane. As I said earlier Foden is another that suffered from the same fate, you want him attacking the box and causing chaos not picking the ball up 40 yards from his own goal all game, hence I have major sympathy for him (not least playing him on the left to shoehorn others.
Alas its done anyway, Southgate had his go, he did well and we now have to move on seemingly
Oh I agree, there are selections I would have done differently but at the same time I'm also aware that there is a lot more to it when you're actually in the hotseat that you have to consider way beyond what we would comprehend or see. Yeah, hopefully the FA comes up with a decent appointment to improve on Southgate's good work....I agree with alot of this BUT the overhyping of players does not explain away the fact we didn't play any of them in their desired or more effective role in the tournament, heck we were experimenting with TAA in midfield into the second game. I am ok with a better Dele Alli (an analogy I agree with BTW) but then you have to play a system and style that benefits both him and for that matter Kane. As I said earlier Foden is another that suffered from the same fate, you want him attacking the box and causing chaos not picking the ball up 40 yards from his own goal all game, hence I have major sympathy for him (not least playing him on the left to shoehorn others.
Alas its done anyway, Southgate had his go, he did well and we now have to move on seemingly