• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Jan Vertonghen

The NFL, where there are far more concussions, has a better protocol for head injuries, including sticking the dazed player in a tent away from the glare of cameras and thousands of supporters. The primary concern must be about player safety and if that means a player is withdrawn for a check then they are either substituted for the rest of the match or FIF/UEFA look ta ways of using a temporary sub until the player is deemed fit to return to play.

There is no reason we can’t do the same, just stop the game for 15/20 mins whilst the injured player is assessed. Put a message up on the screen and open the bars, treat it like a rain delay in cricket.
 
I'm not sure there was any contact on the head. It was just on the nose, which is an appendage. The dizziness could just have been from blood loss.

I had a very similar knock a few years ago. The blood was quite spectacular, but once that was washed off, it was basically just a small cut across the bridge
It certainly had no effect on your cognitive abilities.

(just kidding...you go girl)
 
There is no reason we can’t do the same, just stop the game for 15/20 mins whilst the injured player is assessed. Put a message up on the screen and open the bars, treat it like a rain delay in cricket.
Have you thought that one through though? What about when you're losing a critical match? The moment there's even the slightest hint of heads clashing what do you think would happen? Manager needs to break up play, frustrate the opposition, annoy their fans, get the players a rest, re-motivate them, change strategy, give instructions etc.
 
Have you thought that one through though? What about when you're losing a critical match? The moment there's even the slightest hint of heads clashing what do you think would happen? Manager needs to break up play, frustrate the opposition, annoy their fans, get the players a rest, re-motivate them, change strategy, give instructions etc.

what's wrong with that?
 
Are you serious?

managers will always do everything they can to influence the game, thats their job

I'm suggesting a system to improve protection of players who have suffered head injuries and take away the macho expectation of just getting on with it, I'm sure there are good arguments for doing things a different way but football managers having one more opportunity (on top of 100 others in a game) to behave like football managers isn't really an issue imo
 
managers will always do everything they can to influence the game, thats their job

I'm suggesting a system to improve protection of players who have suffered head injuries and take away the macho expectation of just getting on with it, I'm sure there are good arguments for doing things a different way but football managers having one more opportunity (on top of 100 others in a game) to behave like football managers isn't really an issue imo
I get we have to do everything possible to protect players, I just don't see the need to suspend play for 15-20 minutes when the simple answer is to allow a temporary sub.

Anyone at WHL the last couple of games will know the frustration caused by West Ham and Ajax's delaying tactics every time the keeper took a goal kick so I dread to think how they'd react when convinced a player was feigning a head injury in order to break up play for 15 minutes.

Especially from fans liable to miss the last train/bus/whatever as a result
 
I get we have to do everything possible to protect players, I just don't see the need to suspend play for 15-20 minutes when the simple answer is to allow a temporary sub.

Anyone at WHL the last couple of games will know the frustration caused by West Ham and Ajax's delaying tactics every time the keeper took a goal kick so I dread to think how they'd react when convinced a player was feigning a head injury in order to break up play for 15 minutes.

Especially from fans liable to miss the last train/bus/whatever as a result

rolling subs in cases of head injury is no less open to abuse

any attacking third set piece would be met with all of the short players collapsing to the ground holding their heads
 
rolling subs in cases of head injury is no less open to abuse

any attacking third set piece would be met with all of the short players collapsing to the ground holding their heads
Referee discretion with VAR to back it up.
If VAR shows a clear faking whilst treatment is happening (independent Dr to be there) - automatic sending off.
 
"We followed the protocol. You can see on TV all that happened.

"Our doctor and medical staff behaved very well, they were excellent, followed the protocol. I respect because I think I’m professional about football, not medicine.

"All decisions about health are for medical staff. The assessments on concussion were negative, that’s why the player was allowed to play.

"A few seconds after that was a completely different thing, he start to feel no good. After that we changed in that moment, and he was out of the pitch."

Yes, [on the night] he was conscious," Poch added.

""You can watch when he changed his shorts, in the tunnel, because he was a little bit worried about not changing his shorts in front of everyone.

"And that behaviour made clear he was conscious in every single moment.

"That’s why when the doctor followed the protocol they allowed him to go on the pitch."

"I don’t have the capacity to take some decisions. For me, at every single of my clubs, the doctor are independent, all the decisions they make are protecting always the health of the players. That’s my rule," Poch said.

"At Saints, in my first season, when the situation with Hugo Lloris and Lukaku in Everton in 2013, we used this clip to talk with the players and all the staff – and gave all the power to the medical staff to take the decision.

"I’m not a person who is going to take a decision in front of the doctor or medical staff. We used it as an example.

"I explained to the players they can say whatever they want on the pitch but the bosses are the medical staff. Not my coaches and myself are going to say nothing against the decision of the medical staff.

"My rule from the first day here and my rule is my priority is not the game or the result or anything that is related with the football, the priority is always the person."

"For me, if the doctor said to me that he has some doubts, I’m more than happy to change the player. I’m not going to put in risk any player. That’s a debate about the doctor to find the best solution," the Spurs boss explained.

"For me, it’s so easy. If the doctor has minimal doubts, I’m more than happy to support the doctor. I’ll always support my medical staff.

"You can ask the referees. They were in Spanish, talking about the situation. The referee for me was fantastic. I want to praise him for his amazing behaviour. His priority was the health of the player.

"He said to me ‘Mauricio, are you sure he’s in a condition to play?’ I said, ‘Ask the doctor, not me’. ‘Doctor is he in a condition to play?’ ‘Yes’, ‘ok, go in’. That’s the most important thing. Of course we can talk - I’m open to debate but I want to help the player avoid risk."
 
Update on the OS :

Following a thorough review over the past 48 hours by our medical staff as well as by an independent neurologist with special interest in sport-related concussion today, it has been concluded that Jan Vertonghen did not suffer a concussion during Tuesday’s Champions League semi-final first leg against Ajax.

The Belgium defender suffered an injury to his nose due to a challenge during the game which resulted in heavy bleeding. He was deemed fit to continue playing after an on-field assessment. All Football Association concussion guidelines were followed.

Jan was immediately withdrawn as a result of the player informing medical staff that symptoms were developing suddenly and that he no longer felt stable standing up. We have been advised that this was the result of a presyncopal episode, a near faint.

The specialist has recommended that the player undertakes a brief period of rehabilitation before returning to training.
 
I'm pleased to see that for two reasons. Firstly, it means Jan is OK. There was no "head injury" and it was just a response to the bleeding. Secondly, I was concerned that we were repeating the mistakes made with Lloris.
 
Back