Gordinho
Banned
Re: John Terry retires from England duty
Right, I might be coming across as a bit thick here and I'm probably labouring the point a bit but bear with me please, how can Terry base his defence on answering a question that he was never asked? Surely if AF is asked if he asked the question of JT and says no then how can JT claim to have been repeating the question back? I'm sure cleverer men than me wouldn't have let that opportunity go by in court.
Anton says he didn't hear it and didn't find out until after the game. It was someone in the crowd (an off-duty policeman?) who reported it to the police and then they had to take action.
Terry's story is what got him acquitted in the criminal court. He could deny he uttered the words, so he needed an explanation that couldn't be disproved. It obviously worked as the judge said the evidence wasn't clear so he could rile out Terry's explanation. Terry's lawyer probably made sure he didn't directly ask him if it was true. The irony is that if Terry followed the demands he apologise then he risks proving that he perjured himself.
The fines and ban are set out in the rule book and the two charges are very specific. The FA can't just make up some fine and penalty. The FA penalty is a lot stiffer than the legal one would have been. If Terry had been found guilty in the criminal case he would have had a maximum fine of £2500.
Right, I might be coming across as a bit thick here and I'm probably labouring the point a bit but bear with me please, how can Terry base his defence on answering a question that he was never asked? Surely if AF is asked if he asked the question of JT and says no then how can JT claim to have been repeating the question back? I'm sure cleverer men than me wouldn't have let that opportunity go by in court.