You want your cake and to eat it too, Dubai. That's not always possible. Poch didn't throw the game; he took a gamble that the second string could get a result at Dortmund, which would have allowed him to keep the main team fresh for the run in in the league, which I'm sure is everyone's first priority. It didn't work out. So be it.
Here's an alternative: we play our first eleven the rest of the way and maybe we get past Dortmund. We keep doing that and by mid-April they're so knackered that we drop out in the quarters or semis AND we slip to 5th by the end of the season.
What a lot of people seem to forget is that making CL is hugely important. We need a couple of quality players to get to the next level. Without the promise of CL and the added revenue that won't happen and we'll be back to square one. There's a longer term strategy in play here and people need to step back and look at the bigger picture.
Well, firstly, I'd argue that the statement that he 'didn't throw the game' is based on semantics to an extent: it could equally be argued that sending out a team of U-18s against Dortmund could be an attempt to win the game, because it involved taking 'a gamble that the U-18s could get a result at Dortmund, which would have allowed him to keep the main team fresh for the run in in the league'. Did he field a much weakened side away against a team on top of their game? Yes. Did he do it with the first-team players who would be considered our 'first eleven' available and fit enough for the bench (and fit enough to be thrown on as we sunk deeper into the mire)? Yes.
I've never once advocated forgetting about the CL: indeed, it's been my focus for a few months now, with 70 points the target that I consider sufficient to secure CL football. That's 15 points from our last nine games, i.e, 4 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses. But I get the feeling that the approach people are adopting when they dismiss this game as an irrelevance in their haste to face Villa and Bournemouth is not a rational, CL-first safety approach: it's some sort of wild dream that throwing away ties against big teams like Dortmund because they're an inconvenience will aid us in rushing to the *title*.
For me, 4 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses is an eminently achievable target, fatigue or no. That will get us to the CL, which is an achievement in and of itself. But, In my view, sacrificing ties like this to preserve fitness given the margin we've built up over the course of the preceding few months is counter-productive, and unnecessary. of our remaining fixtures, even accounting for dropped points against Liverpool, Chelsea and United will still leave us room for a couple of draws or losses to unexpected teams: it's a safety margin that allows us to compete in big games like this, against big sides which themselves were looking forward to testing their mettle against Tottenham Hotspur. In the event, we gave them a damp squid of a game and escaped with a 3-0 loss that we were probably relieved to get, since it could have been worse.
In the end, the danger of constantly throwing away cup games because they're either inconveniently timed or provide a relatively low chance of winning them is that the club becomes an Arsenal Mark 2: constantly prioritizing 4th, entering competitions just to exit them again and turning big games that the fans paid money to excitedly watch and (in the case of our excellent away fans) traveled miles to be at into a run-out for the reserves and kids, because it's more important that we sock Villa or Bournemouth or whoever.
Anyway, I'm trying to follow my own prescriptions and move on from this disappointment. If we finish 4th at the end of the season, that's great progress and an achievement that Poch will be rightly celebrated for: I'll happily give him an 8/10, or thereabouts. It could have been better, though, and I'll definitely note my disappointment at the weakened sides he fielded against Arsenal in the League Cup and now against Dortmund in the EL: it's not right that we treat cup competitions that way, when they're pretty much our only shot of consistently winning things.
And, as an aside, I'd like to imagine that that sort of thing is a nuanced view, at least in part: and it saddens me to observe that more often than not, attempts to develop nuance or maintain reserve are jumped on
in certain instances, Poch's status being one of them. I'm the first person to admit that I get too emotional at times and express myself in excessively florid terms, but what's surprised me is that even relatively uncontroversial statements like 'there are replacements for him if he does leave, and I hope contingency plans have been drawn up to that effect' generate significant disputes. To unreservedly love Poch for his achievements and to blind oneself to his downsides is to once again afford a cult status to a staff member of the club that will only end up hurting us in the long run when they either f*k up or leave: Redknapp was an example of the rollercoaster that engendered, as was Bale on the playing side. I'd imagine that, with our history, we'd be a lot more careful in who we decide to unreservedly trust and adore, only affording such privileges to people with the right criteria or sufficient time spent at the club. Certainly that was the lesson I learned from having my heart broken by those times: ergo, I find that this constant need for the restatement of one's priors before affording nuances that run contrary to the popular opinion in cases like that of Poch ('I'm very happy with what he's done
overall this season, buuuuuut he was sh*te today') more than a little disheartening, because I thought that was a lesson that everyone had learned.
Anyway, like I said, trying to follow my own prescriptions. On to Villa, and let's hope our gamble (as you put it) was worth it.