PossiblyPEH gone, So Gil mostly gone, Royal close
Just GLC & Reguilon left, or does anyone think Skipp is on the list as well?
PEH gone, So Gil mostly gone, Royal close
Just GLC & Reguilon left, or does anyone think Skipp is on the list as well?
There’s not that much room, even with those gone. See my post in the Squad thread. I was surprised how little.Possibly
Just pleased we’re making room in the squad
PEH gone, So Gil mostly gone, Royal close
Just GLC & Reguilon left, or does anyone think Skipp is on the list as well?
Solomon and Whiteman probably both need to go too for the sake of their careers. Possibly Scarlett too.
Scarlett probably has another loan in him before we pull the trigger
I don’t get why people are getting their knickers in a twist about players not wanted going on loan. I’m sure the club knows what its doing and the finances behind it all. People really find negatives in everything they can. Its like going to Tesco and moaning that they are trying to sell something on the shelf that no one is buying and having a moan because its a waste of space. It doesn’t really have anything to do with any of us. People moan as if they have a share in the club or something, its baffling.
I don’t get why people are getting their knickers in a twist about players not wanted going on loan. I’m sure the club knows what its doing and the finances behind it all. People really find negatives in everything they can. Its like going to Tesco and moaning that they are trying to sell something on the shelf that no one is buying and having a moan because its a waste of space. It doesn’t really have anything to do with any of us. People moan as if they have a share in the club or something, its baffling.
Scarlett probably has another loan in him before we pull the trigger
I understand number 2 but regarding number 1, how do you know our transfer budget is so limited that we need £12m to make the signings we want?A couple of reasons the gil being loaned is not ideal.
1/ we have a limited transfer budget. This is boosted by any sales made. Not selling him means we have less money to bring in new players.
2/ we have a limit on how many players can be loaned out. Gil taking one of those spots means that another player can't be loaned. Which may give them valuable match experience.
A couple of reasons the gil being loaned is not ideal.
1/ we have a limited transfer budget. This is boosted by any sales made. Not selling him means we have less money to bring in new players.
2/ we have a limit on how many players can be loaned out. Gil taking one of those spots means that another player can't be loaned. Which may give them valuable match experience.
I understand number 2 but regarding number 1, how do you know our transfer budget is so limited that we need £12m to make the signings we want?
And all that has already just applied to Hojbjerg too.
He is loaned though because no one wants to buy him because he is a weakling who only passes backwardsA couple of reasons the gil being loaned is not ideal.
1/ we have a limited transfer budget. This is boosted by any sales made. Not selling him means we have less money to bring in new players.
2/ we have a limit on how many players can be loaned out. Gil taking one of those spots means that another player can't be loaned. Which may give them valuable match experience.
He is loaned though because no one wants to buy him because he is a weakling who only passes backwards
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a less inspiring player come on for us
He just hasn’t invested the time or effort needed to play on this league physically
I’d prefer him gone … asapYes i know. Doesn't change that i'd prefer if it was a sale rather than a loan.