Swansea deserved a replay out of this.
And now another d1ck runs on a football pitch, what is it with these idiots?
Swansea deserved a replay out of this.
And now another d1ck runs on a football pitch, what is it with these idiots?
Why's VAR not available today?
Now a second goal that wouldn't stand.
If he wasn't looking to get a pen, why did he look straight over to the ref? You don't do that if you just fall over. It's a crystal clear dive to try to con the ref into giving a penalty.You are allowed to go over on a soaking wet pitch when running quickly and being tackled imo. Players always end up on their arse when attacking the by-line and getting tackled. Wasn't a pen, wasn't a dive imo.
And now City go and get an offside goal...
kin hell.
No replays. Would’ve been ET then penalties.
If he wasn't looking to get a pen, why did he look straight over to the ref? You don't do that if you just fall over. It's a crystal clear dive to try to con the ref into giving a penalty.
Yes, if he gets tackled, or trying to cross at full pelt. Sterling did neither! He just fell over when he saw the tackle coming, expecting to be caught, but he wasn't. How is it not a dive then? If that's not a dive, then nothing is.Maybe, but what 'm saying is, when a player is running towards the by-line and another player tackles him, it's very common for the attacker to end up on his arse, dive or not. You'd have to ban someone in every game of football being played if you want bans for that.
Yes, if he gets tackled, or trying to cross at full pelt. Sterling did neither! He just fell over when he saw the tackle coming, expecting to be caught, but he wasn't. How is it not a dive then? If that's not a dive, then nothing is.
Does seem that way.Well, either way, the refs have phucked Swansea today. Wasn't a penalty and the winner was offside.
Sometimes, I do wonder if the game is just crooked.
Does seem that way.
It's almost like it would good to do it like rugby; the ref makes a decision and asks another to confirm if it needs changing.If you were going to make sure City won the 2nd half, but do so in a way that just gets put down to incompetence, an iffy penalty and letting City forwards go into offside positions without flagging would be a good way to go about it imo. We know it's happened in other countries, we know City's owners are dodgy as phuck. Even VAR won't mean sh1t, refs just interpret stuff in ridiculous ways to get to the decision they want.
Trust in the officials.
That’s the thing I don’t get
The argument has been its available for grounds that have it
How has Swanseas stadium not got it yet is used for rugby for example so replays for the ref ...