• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

The Official 2022/23 Premier League Thread

markysimmo said:
They still have to play us, City x 2 and United, it's far from over yet
Click to expand...
Yep and all those teams also have to play each other. They are all going to drop points
They also went out the Carabou cup early and avoided one round in the Europa League ko stage as well.
They can probably afford to lose/ draw them all and still get over the line.
Let's see what happens tomorrow, after today's result , a draw wouldn't be a disaster for them.
 
I don't know the wording of the offside rule as they seemingly change it on a weekly basis, but any sensible football fan (that of course excludes Manure supporters) can see that Rashford was interfering with play there. It's unbelievable, really.

As long as Rashford keeps chasing the ball, City defenders have to keep chasing him, which creates more space for Fernandes to run into. It also meant Ederson had to make his decisions on the basis of two Manure players approaching the box instead of one. It's not exactly rocket science to see that Rashford was very much interfering in the situation.

Had Rashford stopped his run 20 meters earlier, it would have been a different matter, of course. But he didn't. Hence offside.
 
Robbo said:
I don't know the wording of the offside rule as they seemingly change it on a weekly basis, but any sensible football fan (that of course excludes Manure supporters) can see that Rashford was interfering with play there. It's unbelievable, really.

As long as Rashford keeps chasing the ball, City defenders have to keep chasing him, which creates more space for Fernandes to run into. It also meant Ederson had to make his decisions on the basis of two Manure players approaching the box instead of one. It's not exactly rocket science to see that Rashford was very much interfering in the situation.

Had Rashford stopped his run 20 meters earlier, it would have been a different matter, of course. But he didn't. Hence offside.
Click to expand...
Stop being so sensible.
 
Robbo said:
I don't know the wording of the offside rule as they seemingly change it on a weekly basis, but any sensible football fan (that of course excludes Manure supporters) can see that Rashford was interfering with play there. It's unbelievable, really.

As long as Rashford keeps chasing the ball, City defenders have to keep chasing him, which creates more space for Fernandes to run into. It also meant Ederson had to make his decisions on the basis of two Manure players approaching the box instead of one. It's not exactly rocket science to see that Rashford was very much interfering in the situation.

Had Rashford stopped his run 20 meters earlier, it would have been a different matter, of course. But he didn't. Hence offside.
Click to expand...
If he makes an intent to get the ball
Which he did
He is offside
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back