• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Ange in or out?

Ange in or out?

  • In

    Votes: 78 47.3%
  • Out

    Votes: 87 52.7%

  • Total voters
    165
Out of interest, what was Poch's average possession as a Saints manager? Not sure where you're getting these stats from, but isn't the B'mouth vs Saints comparison the right one. Somewhere in between the above numbers would be my guess, probably splitting that gap in half.

stat is isolation is odd, Saints this season have >50% possession and are arguably one of the worse sides to play in EPL history.

But just to show @thfcsteff I'm nice to his guy, it was actually 59% way back then, so was a leading indicator of his potential
 
Different managers, very different styles, completely agree

He's more counter attack vs. Poch possession, he uses wingers more than Poch (FB), I'd say that his system is more decisive in final 3rd, can be a bit more counter/direct but it does create goals from probably less chances than classic Poch.

That said, he could very well be playing within the limitations of his players (i.e. are they playing that way because it suits the system or the players at disposal?), something Ange doesn't do very well.
Pochs Southampton team had wingers in the same way
He had mane… that’s now Semenyo
He had a target man… Rodriguez or lambert or the 2 lads Bournemouth play
Solid CMs
Luke shaw at left back which is Kirkez
experienced but excentfic keeper… boruc for kepa
Under rated pro .., llallana for Tavernier
Under appreciated sites centre back that then went to Liverpool - lovren for Huijsen
Played 4-2-3-1
I could go on
Pochs Southampton wasnt a Poseidon side against the top teams
 
stat is isolation is odd, Saints this season have >50% possession and are arguably one of the worse sides to play in EPL history.

But just to show @thfcsteff I'm nice to his guy, it was actually 59% way back then, so was a leading indicator of his potential

The Iraola debate is one of the best ones. I've not watched much football this season so have had to trust others on it.

On the podcast Milo was talking about finding a manager that will play good possession football if Ange falls on his sword. So it seems that Russell Martin would be way ahead of Iraola on that single consideration. We should also look forward to England under Tuchel playing high possession football based on what I read on google.
 
The Iraola debate is one of the best ones. I've not watched much football this season so have had to trust others on it.

On the podcast Milo was talking about finding a manager that will play good possession football if Ange falls on his sword. So it seems that Russell Martin would be way ahead of Iraola on that single consideration. We should also look forward to England under Tuchel playing high possession football based on what I read on google.
Possession football needs intelligent players
We dint have many of those
 
https://www.football.london/tottenham-hotspur-fc/news/tottenham-eyeing-up-ange-postecoglou-31165842

Tottenham Hotspur are reportedly eyeing a move for Inter Milan manager Simone Inzaghi if they choose to sack Ange Postecoglou.

According to AI ->
Simone Inzaghi is known for his tactical acumen and adaptable management style, which has brought success to teams like Lazio and Inter Milan. His preferred formation is the 3-5-2, emphasizing fluidity and dynamic movement. Here's a breakdown of his approach:

  • Build-Up Play: Inzaghi's teams focus on building through the thirds with short passes, but they are not afraid to play direct when spaces open up. His back-three system often sees center-backs stepping into midfield to create numerical advantages2.
  • Offensive Strategy: Wing-backs play a crucial role, pushing high up the pitch to stretch the opposition and deliver crosses. His strikers work in tandem, with one dropping deep to create space for the other3.
  • Defensive Solidity: Inzaghi's teams maintain compactness and defensive discipline, making them difficult to break down. This balance between attack and defense is a hallmark of his coaching.
  • Adaptability: He adjusts his tactics based on the opposition, showcasing versatility in both possession-based and counter-attacking styles.
Inzaghi's leadership has earned him accolades, including domestic titles and deep runs in European competitions.
 
The other thing I would add is that is Poch's possession meant that every time we had a chance to cross it we retained possession instead then give me Iraola every day. Wasn't it a breath of fresh air to see a full-back taking the very first opportunity to get the ball in the box? Drives me crazy when Porro passes up so many opportunities to feed Solanke in the air or ground in the box.
 
So a serious question

- Is a long term plan linked to long term manager?
- There seems to be a perception that long term manager is the only route to success, I'm not sure I agree, at the top level, the often highlighted piece is Arteta (this point in his 5th season he has less points than Unai had in his first) and that is starting to look like a failure, will be 6 years, more than 600M spent and they haven't pushed on. Slot is likely to win more than one trophy in first year, Jose, Conte, Ange all had better first seasons with us than second ..

I think you talk about frustration (and my beef with club right now is "why is Ange still here"), but think we are mixing up eras/managers/finances to come to odd conclusions

- The great rebuild/refresh is pretty much done (it's taken 5 years and crossed all those managers)
- We have spent a lot money, and most of it very well, squad is well poised for future, with a few smart additions
- Biggest issue is avoiding managers who won't work with youth and/or club signings (that statement about Spence really hasn't aged well)

Iriola is obvious (and hopefully it is to club as well), but lets be clear

- Vic, Kinsky, Porro, Spence, Romero, Danso, Dragusin, VDV, Gray, Udogie, Bentancur, Sarr, Maddison, Bergvall, Wilson, Son, Johnson, Solanke. 18 players with 4? over 27 (I'm assuming Forseter, Timo, Bissouma, Richi are out in summer)
- Moore, Donley, Vuskovich, Yang, Phillips, Keeley all to be looked at, incorporated into side over next year or two.
- DM, LB/LCB, RW and backup CF are obvious areas to add/upgrade
- There will be money in summer

Any decent manager willing to play a front foot style based on 4-3-3, 4-2-3-1 or even 3-5-2 could make this team function to top 6 level.

Look at what Moyes is doing at Everton, they are one point behind us and United after being dead and buried .. and he's just an ok manager.

It's a great question.
Romantics will say yes. But practically, it probably isn't linked to any one manager unless said-manager originted the philosophy the club is adhering to.

It increasingly feels that An
Out of interest, what was Poch's average possession as a Saints manager? Not sure where you're getting these stats from, but isn't the B'mouth vs Saints comparison the right one. Somewhere in between the above numbers would be my guess, probably splitting that gap in half.

With Soton it was 58.6%, so very close to the same. Now that's consistency!!!!
 
The Iraola debate is one of the best ones. I've not watched much football this season so have had to trust others on it.

On the podcast Milo was talking about finding a manager that will play good possession football if Ange falls on his sword. So it seems that Russell Martin would be way ahead of Iraola on that single consideration. We should also look forward to England under Tuchel playing high possession football based on what I read on google.

I think what Milo was saying is we should be looking to a manager who will continue with the philosophy the club has adopted rather than jack it in and do what we did when we f-ucked up sacking Poch and go the opposite way!
 
We don't need a manager that plays possession football. We need a manager that plays progressive football. There's a difference. Fergie's Man Utd were a team that relied on the counter. Not sitting back and counter, but a set traps high up the pitch and counter. Redknapp's Spurs were not really a possession team either but were very exciting to watch.
 
We need a manager who believes in the philosophy the club has built itself to execute for the last 2 seasons.
We do not need to flip like we did when we blew it and sacked Poch.
 
I think what Milo was saying is we should be looking to a manager who will continue with the philosophy the club has adopted rather than jack it in and do what we did when we f-ucked up sacking Poch and go the opposite way!

Yeah, but it was in the context of Iraola not being the right fit if my memory served me right. You seemed to have supported that with some stats of possession vs counter.

The remaining question is whether Iraola can increase those possession stats by 10% and adapt once he has access to our squad. That's the big unknown.

After all, Big Sam did always say that if he had the Real Madrid squad he'd play the Real Madrid way :cool:
 
Like Bissouma isn't capable of holding his position and covering his full backs. It's the same as the full backs being dug out for being out of position. It's the design of the tactics that are leaving areas of the pitch exposed, doesn't matter who the player is.
He showed he could do it to great effect vs Liverpool when we beat them in the cup. We played a very different system that night. But clearly not one which Ange prefers.
 
Back