glasgowspur
Luka Modric
Has anyone actually said that?, if so i must have missed it.
Come right out and said it, no. But there's plenty that have stopped just short.
Has anyone actually said that?, if so i must have missed it.
Come right out and said it, no. But there's plenty that have stopped just short.
I am worried that we will know what we are missing only when he has left. I don't think he has no weaknesses - I would love for him to have the strength and grit of someone like Rose alongside his passing ability. But he is the only player in last year's squad who was truly capable of playing through bus-parking teams (of which we are going to encounter many again this year), and I do not see an obvious replacement. So if he goes, we lose flexibility and options at the very least. And quality.
I think that it is the other way around. When we play well, he plays well. He relies on the other players making moves for him to pick out, if we are flat, he is unable to impose himself on the game and turn things around.
When do we ever play well while he is playing badly? I cant help but believe we are deeply reliant on his performances. If he isnt on song we just dont get going as a team.
That is the crux of it for me and why i really believe we have had a very good window with our two new additions to the C/M. He now will have competition for places and we now will be able to give him the rest time he needs ( something we have not been able to do before).
In theory, yes. In practice I doubt itll happen that way.
It will take some adjustment when he leaves, but eventually we'll cope with that too.I am worried that we will know what we are missing only when he has left. I don't think he has no weaknesses - I would love for him to have the strength and grit of someone like Rose alongside his passing ability. But he is the only player in last year's squad who was truly capable of playing through bus-parking teams (of which we are going to encounter many again this year), and I do not see an obvious replacement. So if he goes, we lose flexibility and options at the very least. And quality.
Won't care, so long as he signs. Not as though Toby's release cause did him any good, is it!I'd assume so.
Then we will have the great mystery of what release clause is in it, if any, and the uncertainty that will follow...
He does know how to put it on a plate! And watching that, his assist tally really should have been much higher! Lots of absolute sitters being missed!
Neither of those clubs are our rivals but for very different reasons.It will be great if we can keep Eriksen. But if we do sell him, hope we will sell him to non-English clubs. It will be stupid if we sell him to our direct rivals like ManU or Emirates Marketing Project.
If he starts am hoping the crowd will be behind him 400% today
I think he will start and he will score a cracker
All this stuff about it being a weakness that we relied on Eriksen so much... I don’t understand why people think the logical solution has to include removing him from the team, rather than just adding to the team. It would be like having just one natural goalscorer in the team, and saying we don’t score goals when he doesn’t play well so we need to get rid of him and find another way to play. Why not play more natural goalscorers alongside him, so we’re not so reliant on him? (Like we do with Kane, Son and Alli?) And likewise with Eriksen, why not aim to play another player alongside him who can also bring what he brings to the table? Why do people think playing him means our style and performance is automatically totally dependent on him, in a way that isn’t true if we play other players and a different style?
Don't think anyone's been saying we need to get rid of Eriksen because we rely on him too much. More that now he's lifted his skirt to other clubs they believe he's no longer committed. Which for me reveals they don't really get what Eriksen is all about. Anyone who has watched him critically over the years will know that if he ends up staying he will continue to give his all. Unquestioningly.All this stuff about it being a weakness that we relied on Eriksen so much... I don’t understand why people think the logical solution has to include removing him from the team, rather than just adding to the team.
Will all depend on him, IMO.
If he starts looking like he can't be bothered it won't be pretty.
If he looks up for it and is trying to make things happen I think it'll be ok.
It's about balance, for me at least.
My thinking is a change of style is how we will accomplish this, at which point I'm unsure how/where Eriksen fits into the new shape.
As above, if he stays, would seem to me he is set for a lot of rotation and being out the team