Eriksen is in danger of being overhyped to the extent that when he has a dip in form next season (if here) he'll get loads of stick.
This is the problem when you have a bad season with most players underperforming or just being dog****. One of the few to stand out as better than average gets credit then becomes a victim of their success when the chips are down. Seen it so many times before.
Erik sen sen sen has a great tune and is a good player but has alot to learn, let's hope it's with us and that one of the top four don't try bringing him in cos he would be a handy squad player for all of them (bar l'**** who have a million players like him).
That's a fair point; Nice to have some creative type to overhype though eh? \o/
Lamela next?[-o<
Eriksen is in danger of being overhyped to the extent that when he has a dip in form next season (if here) he'll get loads of stick.
This is the problem when you have a bad season with most players underperforming or just being dog****. One of the few to stand out as better than average gets credit then becomes a victim of their success when the chips are down. Seen it so many times before.
Erik sen sen sen has a great tune and is a good player but has alot to learn, let's hope it's with us and that one of the top four don't try bringing him in cos he would be a handy squad player for all of them (bar l'**** who have a million players like him).
lets get realistic we're going to be tight on cash due to the stadium build, so history will repeat itself and one more year and he's off just like bale and modric.
lets be proactive and hunt down the next eriksen.
That was supposed to be Halilovic, wasn't it?
lets get realistic we're going to be tight on cash due to the stadium build, so history will repeat itself and one more year and he's off just like bale and modric.
lets be proactive and hunt down the next eriksen.
Lets stop selling our best players so we might actually be able to compete. Being realistic is important but retaining quality is essential.
That was supposed to be Halilovic, wasn't it?
Selling our best players - Levy
Being realistic - us here on the forum
sherwood claiming credit for eriksens transfer
Sherwood claims he first spotted the winger, 22, when he was an 18-year-old playing for Denmark in a 2-1 defeat by England and tried to convince Spurs chairman Daniel Levy to sign him then.
‘I watched him for Denmark in 2011 and I rang Daniel Levy the day after and said that he needed to sign this boy,’ Sherwood said. ‘You are always fearful that someone might come and take one of your best players and Christian is certainly one.’
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/spurs-midfielder-christian-eriksen-could-3437420
nothing wrong with that but he could've said something earlier during avb's tenure to give the guy a boost
sherwood claiming credit for eriksens transfer
Sherwood claims he first spotted the winger, 22, when he was an 18-year-old playing for Denmark in a 2-1 defeat by England and tried to convince Spurs chairman Daniel Levy to sign him then.
‘I watched him for Denmark in 2011 and I rang Daniel Levy the day after and said that he needed to sign this boy,’ Sherwood said. ‘You are always fearful that someone might come and take one of your best players and Christian is certainly one.’
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/spurs-midfielder-christian-eriksen-could-3437420
nothing wrong with that but he could've said something earlier during avb's tenure to give the guy a boost
Without meaning to denounce TS' claims, Eriksen was known to most of the European footballing world even back in 2011. I have no idea about whether or not Eriksen was a TS transfer although we do know that he wasn't an AVB signing (we only know that Paulinho and Soldado were players he wanted, according to the papers that is). At the start of last summer's window I reckoned Eriksen was going to go to a club late in the window as various clubs waited to see if they could get him at the last minute for cheap, I'm more inclined to believe that we got him because it was too good a value to believe. If we believe in the transfer committee then no doubt TS had input at this stage, but the article doesn't make that clear.
As a side note, Eriksen was playing regulalry for AVB until the Wham game where he was marked out of the game, but even after that he still started quite a few games. Then in November he was injured and didn't return until just before AVB got the axe. Whilst AVB may not have had a hand in the signing of Eriksen, I don't think he was marginalised to the extent others think.