• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Injuries

So instead of starting Reguilon as LB so Gray could move into midfield ahead of Sarr the gaffer now has another injured midfielder plus Richarlison, who it sounds like should’ve been subbed at half time.

Ange should not be playing unfit players. Ange should not keep injured players on because they want to give it another ten minutes. Unacceptable. If a manager in other industries showed such incompetence and disregard for the assets of the business they’d probably get the sack. Mate.
 
Ange should not be playing unfit players. Ange should not keep injured players on because they want to give it another ten minutes. Unacceptable. If a manager in other industries showed such incompetence and disregard for the assets of the business they’d probably get the sack. Mate.

He shouldn't have.
Why did he?
Worth asking again and again and again.
 
What's my agenda? Just having spotted that we'd employed the coach most clearly out of his depth since Gross a year ago?
Given the standard of his previous jobs, Ange was always a risk. But his inability to be flexible in many areas has helped get us to this precarious position.
 
IF you have consistently held that view pre-injuries, then that's a fair point.
Absolutely. I was cold to his appointment, thought he was well short of the calibre needed for this league. I warmed to him a lot though with those 2 performances against Arsenal and Liverpool last October and the potential they showed. But then would have sacked him about this time last season when the regression kicked in and gaps in capability really started showing.
 
If a player has a small injury but thinks he can give you 45.

Option A - play him for 45, he can't really get about and plays poorly, then is out for weeks

Option B - rest him and play someone who is not quite as good, then play him when fit





It HAS to be option B every time. Every time.

Never risk injured players as they will be lost for 6 weeks.

Never expect a player to play 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 twice per week. Force yourself to change it around so they can stay energised e.g. 90 90 30 90 90 30 or whatever makes sense.
 
If a player has a small injury but thinks he can give you 45.

Option A - play him for 45, he can't really get about and plays poorly, then is out for weeks

Option B - rest him and play someone who is not quite as good, then play him when fit





It HAS to be option B every time. Every time.

Never risk injured players as they will be lost for 6 weeks.

Never expect a player to play 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 twice per week. Force yourself to change it around so they can stay energised e.g. 90 90 30 90 90 30 or whatever makes sense.

I'm sure plenty of managers will and do take option A depending on the scenario but to do so in our situation just seems crazy atm and it's probably been going on a while now
 
I'm sure plenty of managers will and do take option A depending on the scenario but to do so in our situation just seems crazy atm and it's probably been going on a while now
They all do take A
The game has so much pressure on it
We as fans think it’s daft
GHod knows what the players think of it
They are treated like highly paid prize cattle
 
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cq55wy2qx21o

Article on last years injuries
We had the highest number of players injured at 22
United had the highest number of actual injuries
Some interesting facts in there
Was a record year for soft tissues injuries
11 was a new high for players out for a game but I think we have topped that a few times this season and had 11 out again today plus 2 injured players playing

There is constant talk about Bournemouth missing so many players.,l sure I read 13!!!. Below is the players missing according to a reputable site, tonight. That’s 4 players missing from when they started their great run in November. ,abbé there are others that this site doesn’t pick up.

IMG_0407.png

And before the usual he is making up an excuse, I’m just stating the facts is that when people start an argument they can relate it to some data points or not..
 
Back