• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Politics, politics, politics (so long and thanks for all the fish)


Right, so I'm going to remove all the noise from this article (you know the bits where a journalist prints a load of vague implications to imply stuff that isn't true - such as the bit about Sperbank) and highlight the key bits of information The Guardian (not me) have written in the article:
- Banks was presented with an offer to invest in something that he was told could make him a lot of money.
- He showed an interest in it (because they were claiming he could make him a lot of money).
- He passed it on to an investment firm he has an interest in to do due diligence on the offer.
- (the key bit in the Guardian article if you don't want to be taken for a mug by the journalist writing it): having done his due diligence HE CHOSE NOT TO INVEST.
 
Back