Glenda's Legs
Paul Walsh
Swiped from a poster on TFC, because it made me laugh :
Swiped from a poster on TFC, because it made me laugh :
Happens to us all on the bus occasionally.Clearly looked down at her ding dong
There were some quotes a while back from the club about how they were fulfilling their obligations to provide a clean stadium for the athletics ( as if they had a choice!) and how everything removed from the stadium would be stored in a very secure environment for safekeeping.
I would suggest that anyone who takes the DLR to/from Stratford takes a look out the window on the side opposite the stadium between Stratford and Pudding Mill Lane. There's a big open area - kind of a 'parking lot' -full of seats and hoardings. #safeandsecure.
I've got a feeling they're going to cut their losses and sell it to them - possibly renting it back for the athletics events.And now today's financial study about the "London" stadium comes out............hahaha.
Ground share with Millwall
You're gonna ground share with Millwall....
Meaning they'd own it - but would still have to keep the trackI've got a feeling they're going to cut their losses and sell it to them - possibly renting it back for the athletics events.
Yep. Any scenario that results in them removing the track would only mean having to pay Levy another chunk - I can't see that happening.Meaning they'd own it - but would still have to keep the track
Don't burst my bubble....burst theirsI've got a feeling they're going to cut their losses and sell it to them - possibly renting it back for the athletics events.
It's unusable as a football stadium, so they may have little choice.Would West Ham want to buy it? The deal they have favours them so ridiculously...
It seems not. Or at least WHU are taking the stance that they have a watertight 99 year lease agreement.Any way for Kahn to force them to "renegotiate" the terms of the deal?
It is clear that significant changes will be needed to E20 if its financial sustainability is to be improved. Many of the options available to E20 were explored in a Board presentation on 6 October 2016, certain of which are detailed below:
Not transitioning the East Stand between football and athletics events
Not holding annual athletics events
Increasing secondary revenue streams through means such as MLB and cricket
Re-tendering for the Stadium operator
Selling the Stadium
Shutting the Stadium
The operating costs of the relocatable seating which now represent the largest annual expense to E20. These costs are in excess of £10m per annum, which is over 300 times greater than the figure budgeted (of £300k). This cost is not just limited to one year, but is an ongoing issue as the movement of seats is required every year, and this level of operating cost is not expected to be reduced without a new solution for seating being implemented, at considerable additional capital expense.
Yep. Any scenario that results in them removing the track would only mean having to pay Levy another chunk - I can't see that happening.