'The proposals before you this evening do little to uplift the lives of people living in the area and fails those that it should be helping'Bloody hell good on him.
Shocking and without wanting to bring politics into this thread shows what is wrong with society today where greed and profit are wrongly above all else.
Has David Lammy commented on it ?
'The proposals before you this evening do little to uplift the lives of people living in the area and fails those that it should be helping'
I am glad that my club is a caring part of the community, shows empathy towards a pretty deprived part of London and is trying to do something positive about it.
Lets not pretend it's all altruistic on the clubs part. It's in levy and the clubs best interest for the area to prosper. Land values go up. People have more disposable income in their pocket. It's a win win for everyone. Especially the council, less people on benefits more people paying council tax. Which is why it's so unbelievable they looked like accepting it.
Well apart from land values and those are only important while they own a property company in the area, the rest I doubt they care about.
More people with money in their pockets mean they can go to games or events at the stadium.
I went to a tools fair at the Amex a few years ago and that was while living in Chichester 50 miles away.
Lets not pretend it's all altruistic on the clubs part. It's in levy and the clubs best interest for the area to prosper. Land values go up. People have more disposable income in their pocket. It's a win win for everyone. Especially the council, less people on benefits more people paying council tax. Which is why it's so unbelievable they looked like accepting it.
Is anything ever truly altruistic? I work with disabled kids, the wages suck, but at least I can go to bed every day feeling like I've done something worthwhile. So, I do something good, and feel good in return. Don't think I'd do it if I didn't feel like it gave me anything.
So yeah, win win, innit.
Why are councils so badly run? Seems ubiquitous. Whether Tottenham, Hackney they seem to have structures and people who are incapable of doing anything proactive with their responsibility and resources. The number of awful ugly developments that are approved making developers insane profits, its almost like the developers are bribing officials. I don't think they are, just that local government is bereft of talent, motivation and vision. Modern quickly built developments are a license to print money. Little half-million pound + boxes, multiplied by X units.
Resources are a big factor, do they get really get enough to do anything truly proactive? These big developers come along, stick a few quid in the coffers by buying the land etc and say "oh yeh we'll build some "affordable rent" units" so the council and developer can play off the social element whilst raking in the dough on the market rent, shared ownership and outright sales.
I think its too easy to blame a lack of funding. Of course that is an issue. But so are structural issues. They are organisations that need a massive shake up. With people in jobs who are too comfortable, and achieving too little. That is not a money thing that is a motivation and management thing. In reality councils get huge sums of money (£50b a year appx). Yes they have to do a huge amount with it. But we excuse poor performance far too easily imo.
The council can counter that with conditions, and if necessary, legal obligations (S106s) ....of course if they're on the ball and can be bothered.The issue is it's a permission system not a planning system. Developers ask for permission to build what they want instead of the council saying in our plan we want a development that includes x y and z and then developers submit their application to build that plan.