• Dear Guest, Please note that adult content is not permitted on this forum. We have had our Google ads disabled at times due to some posts that were found from some time ago. Please do not post adult content and if you see any already on the forum, please report the post so that we can deal with it. Adult content is allowed in the glory hole - you will have to request permission to access it. Thanks, scara

Ange in or out?

Ange in or out?

  • In

    Votes: 91 58.3%
  • Out

    Votes: 65 41.7%

  • Total voters
    156
When did he say that?

Why do people make things up? There's enough to criticise him about without it, surely.
I have no idea why people make things up.

Re; Ange's comments about winning things in his second season - take twenty seconds to Google it, then come back and correct the record.
Cheers.
 
What makes you think after tonight we can go away to Gala (for example ) and not get battered
They're a strange club. They got Icardi and Osimhen which was mega, then Icardi got an ACL injury and is out til summer, so Osimhen is the man, then they had oldies like Zaha Ziyech Lemina and Morata but they shipped some of them straight back out again, I can't remember who is still there.
So they do have some players that WERE excellent, but THFC should be able to give them a proper good game IF our players are fit.
 
I have no idea why people make things up.

Re; Ange's comments about winning things in his second season - take twenty seconds to Google it, then come back and correct the record.
Cheers.
I'm confused. It was you who made it up, then you who say you have no idea why people make things up?

Ange said [[[up to this point in my life, across lots of different jobs]]]"I win things in my second year".

He didn't say he will win things in his second year at THFC.

You know that though, why are you being like that?
 
I have no idea why people make things up.

Re; Ange's comments about winning things in his second season - take twenty seconds to Google it, then come back and correct the record.
Cheers.


See above. He didn't say it. You've fallen for the media narrative without actually listening to what he said.
 
I'm really struggling to understand what he sees during matches and understand the changes he makes. It was obvious the midfield was the issue and should've been changed at half time, not about 15 mins into the second half. Son was a passenger, again, how does he not take him off?
It's getting more and more frustrating. I know the squad is bare, but there were changes he could've made. Bergvall has been our best midfielder for the last few months, he's aggressive, and that aggression was needed tonight. Moore in place of Son.
He should have started Bergvall and Gray in midfield, with Bents as the veteran in there. Sarr and Bissouma are just brick. All 3 of those starters need upgrading though. Hope we ve seen the last of Richy too.
Im sure if we hadnt got the 2 new players in in that last few days Ange wouldve been sacked after this no show.
I think he ll limp on now till the end of the season unfortunately .
 
I have no idea why people make things up.

Re; Ange's comments about winning things in his second season - take twenty seconds to Google it, then come back and correct the record.
Cheers.
I think it’s more the inference he made, he has historically always won stuff in his second season ( I have no idea of this is true or not) and therefore why would this season be any different.

I think that’s the impression he wanted to give, which wasn’t a wise choice.
 
When did he say that?

Why do people make things up? There's enough to criticise him about without it, surely.
The media spun “I always win something in my 2nd season” to “I’m going to win something here in my 2nd season”. He stated a fact that got twisted and people lapped up the latter version.
 
The media spun “I always win something in my 2nd season” to “I’m going to win something here in my 2nd season”. He stated a fact that got twisted and people lapped up the latter version.
probably shouldn’t have said it in the first place then as it’s a natural inference
 
Back