The discussion before was about the Tottenham way and the style of footballI've had a look and can't find anything else about it other than that q+a, so if you have it post it pls (I don't have X btw)
The Spurs way of not winning anything?
Like @harr1984, I'd rather see the full quote because Ange has always spoken before about not just playing attractive football but playing winning football so something seems off with this quote. As it's being presented, it does feed too conveniently into a narrative.Red flag.
Seems only yesterday everyone was stating they would rather see entertaining football rather than suffer Mourinho/Conte etc. for the sake of trophies. Turns out people want everything and right now!
That’s the full quoteLike @harr1984, I'd rather see the full quote because Ange has always spoken before about not just playing attractive football but playing winning football so something seems off with this quote. As it's being presented, it does feed too conveniently into a narrative.
Ange is usually fairly insightful when you watch his full press conferences but a few of his quotes recently have been taken out of context or given unnecessary weight. You can sort of understand why other players and managers give such bland non-answers.
Saw some posts on SM this morning to say we haven't been entertaining since the first 10 games last season. We have. The Chelsea 1-4 was entertaining as f**k. Against Brighton when we lost 4-2 we were entertaining and likewise against the Dippers in the 2-4. It just wasn't an enjoyable watch as a fan because we lost. There were lots of other entertaining games last season and, this season, we've been a pretty good watch in all the games bar maybe Woolwich. We've never had a goalless draw under Ange as far as I'm aware and even 1-0 results have been rare (Woolwich and Luton?).Seems only yesterday everyone was stating they would rather see entertaining football rather than suffer Mourinho/Conte etc. for the sake of trophies. Turns out people want everything and right now!
Saw some posts on SM this morning to say we haven't been entertaining since the first 10 games last season. We have. The Chelsea 1-4 was entertaining as f**k. Against Brighton when we lost 4-2 we were entertaining and likewise against the Dippers in the 2-4. It just wasn't an enjoyable watch as a fan because we lost. There were lots of other entertaining games last season and, this season, we've been a pretty good watch in all the games bar maybe Woolwich. We've never had a goalless draw under Ange as far as I'm aware and even 1-0 results have been rare (Woolwich and Luton?).
We're entertaining as Premier League teams go but by "entertaining", it seems a lot of people mean "entertaining and winning".
Seems only yesterday everyone was stating they would rather see entertaining football rather than suffer Mourinho/Conte etc. for the sake of trophies. Turns out people want everything and right
Seems only yesterday everyone was stating they would rather see entertaining football rather than suffer Mourinho/Conte etc. for the sake of trophies. Turns out people want everything and right now!
We've seen those early games this season rather differently. And I don't think Ange thinks we've been awful for the last 6 months either.i don't get it - the last 6 months of football was awful. pre season included. was that the spurs way?
our early matches were lots of sideways passing and walking football. that can't be the spurs way too.
it would have been more insightful if this fans forum had occurred a week ago.
I really don't think we've been awful at all. The intent to attack is always there, sometimes it's difficult to break down teams who counter our style of play (like Woolwich did).i don't get it - the last 6 months of football was awful. pre season included. was that the spurs way?
our early matches were lots of sideways passing and walking football. that can't be the spurs way too.
it would have been more insightful if this fans forum had occurred a week ago.
I don’t think they do that as ,ice as people think anywayHas there been a hint of pragmatism in the last couple of games? Full backs don't seem quite as shape-destroyingly reckless with their runs forward?