StephenH
David Ginola
Id still take him for a season he's a truly world-class goalscorer!except for the CL in Zlatan’s case. He’s allergic to that trophy.
his four against England were delicious!
Last edited:
Id still take him for a season he's a truly world-class goalscorer!except for the CL in Zlatan’s case. He’s allergic to that trophy.
Maybe he just realised Shaw ain't that good. Hasn't exactly kicked on now Jose has left has he.
Possibly but there are ways of going about it. You don’t have to emasculate players because they aren’t performing how you would like.
I don’t think he’s a taco, he’s a bloody intelligent guy and a lot of what he says is to deflect from his players in the same way Fergie did and Poch does albeit in a different style. Despite his sometimes inflammatory words he is a really popular guy on the manager circuit, and I don’t just mean well respected but actually massively liked guy - many managers have spoken about how the Mourinho in the press is very different to the guy they know. And I imagine that is the same with his players, inevitably there are going to be fall outs but he seems to get that line between friend and respect with the players correct. Something that maybe is part of the problem with Poch, the balance leaning towards being more friends - especially when coming to making tough decisions.....
A point that seems to have been overlooked, in the case of Jose Mourhino is wages. He was reportedly on 18 million a year at Utd. Our current manager is paid less than half of that sum.
I somehow can't see Daniel Levy forking over 18 million a year unless it was largely incentive based.
He was probably only going to ask for 9, but woodward offered 18.A point that seems to have been overlooked, in the case of Jose Mourhino is wages. He was reportedly on 18 million a year at Utd. Our current manager is paid less than half of that sum.
I somehow can't see Daniel Levy forking over 18 million a year unless it was largely incentive based.
I certainly won’t deny or argue against his record winning trophies. I just think he’s set in his ways and hasn’t accepted the game has moved on. For example, five years ago it would be unthinkable to be so gung ho in the champions league, especially away games. 0-0 at home in a knockout game was considered a good result and in a way it kind of still is but football in general is far more attack minded, look the last World Cup and the CL in the last 2-3 years. Jose essentially plays chicken and aims for a 1-0.
Look at how he treated Luke Shaw. I’m still not sure what he was trying to achieve.
Jose's teams score goals. And they rarely let them in.
You are right, we know how he will play. 433/4231/4321, mid block. Highly reactive to win the ball. Very well structured defensively. Attacking players allowed a bit more freedom. Width from fullbacks.
None of which is revolutionary, but its also proven to work. And isnt a million mile from what Poch has been doing with us either.
He will be a pragmatist, which is the bit Id struggle with more. Going into a game and playing for a 0-0 never has sat well with me, but Mourinho would do it without hesitation. To his credit, thats how he wins the CL with Porto or Inter, so its not like you can complain about the result. BUT that reactive nature, play to beat the opposition rather than play your own game (in big games, to be fair) - that would take some getting used to.
The Shaw thing I thought was appalling. I dont ever like to see a manager hammer players like that. As noted up thread though - he is the only manager in 5 (or 6?) years to get a tune out of him....
Can’t disagree with most of this. You can’t argue with his methods in the past that have bought him sustained periods of success. I just question whether his methods would work today. Like I said before, the game has changed. Champions League games are nowhere near as cagey as they used to be. The teams and managers who play fast, direct, progressive and attacking football are the ones who are successful. Has Mourinho really got that in his locker? Could he have orchestrated a comeback like ours against Ajax or Liverpool’s against Barca last season? Playing devil’s advocate one might argue he would set his teams up to be more compact and not so open but even the very best teams in Europe can concede 3 goals in 45 mins in the champions league such is the quality of attacking football right now in Europe.
2 seasons ago his out of date methods took a brick Man Utd squad to 81 points and second (ahead of us)
3 seasons ago it won them the EUROPA league and League cup.
Is it actually fair to declare his methods as "out of date" and make statements like "would they work today"?
"Could he have orchestrated a comeback...." - would his team have been that far behind?
I think views on his teams play are exaggerated by most peoples experience of them being the big games (Im guilty of this). Where he is often decidedly compact/cagey/negative(?) because he will quite happily hunker down for a borefest to get the result.
Most games though, his team score plenty of goals (full seasons).
Porto 02-03 gf73(2) ga26(1) GD+47 - 2nd best goals scored, 1st for least goals conceeded
Porto 03-04 gf63(1) ga19(1) GD+44
Chelsea 04-05 gf72(2) ga15(1) GD+57
Chelsea 05-06 gf72(1) ga22(1) GD+50
Chelsea 06-07 gf64(2) ga24(1) GD+40
Inter 08-09 gf70(1) ga32(1) GD+38
Inter 09-10 gf75(1) ga34(1) GD+41
Madrid 10-11 gf102(1) ga33(2) GD+69 - Outscores Barca
Madrid 11-12 gf121(1) ga32(2) GD+89 - Outscores Barca
Madrid 12-13 gf103(2) ga42(3) GD+61
Chelsea 13-14 gf71(3) ga27(1) GD+44
Chelsea 14-15 gf73(2) ga32(1) GD+41
United 16-17 gf54(8) ga29(2) GD+25
United 17-18 gf68(5) ga28(2) GD+40
I dont think he is a new, up and coming, progressive sort of coach. And I fully understand the appeal of such.
However, I dont think its really fair to declare his methods out of date either.
2 seasons ago his out of date methods took a brick Man Utd squad to 81 points and second (ahead of us)
3 seasons ago it won them the EUROPA league and League cup.
Is it actually fair to declare his methods as "out of date" and make statements like "would they work today"?
"Could he have orchestrated a comeback...." - would his team have been that far behind?
I think views on his teams play are exaggerated by most peoples experience of them being the big games (Im guilty of this). Where he is often decidedly compact/cagey/negative(?) because he will quite happily hunker down for a borefest to get the result.
Most games though, his team score plenty of goals (full seasons).
Porto 02-03 gf73(2) ga26(1) GD+47 - 2nd best goals scored, 1st for least goals conceeded
Porto 03-04 gf63(1) ga19(1) GD+44
Chelsea 04-05 gf72(2) ga15(1) GD+57
Chelsea 05-06 gf72(1) ga22(1) GD+50
Chelsea 06-07 gf64(2) ga24(1) GD+40
Inter 08-09 gf70(1) ga32(1) GD+38
Inter 09-10 gf75(1) ga34(1) GD+41
Madrid 10-11 gf102(1) ga33(2) GD+69 - Outscores Barca
Madrid 11-12 gf121(1) ga32(2) GD+89 - Outscores Barca
Madrid 12-13 gf103(2) ga42(3) GD+61
Chelsea 13-14 gf71(3) ga27(1) GD+44
Chelsea 14-15 gf73(2) ga32(1) GD+41
United 16-17 gf54(8) ga29(2) GD+25
United 17-18 gf68(5) ga28(2) GD+40
I dont think he is a new, up and coming, progressive sort of coach. And I fully understand the appeal of such.
However, I dont think its really fair to declare his methods out of date either.
Brilliant post.2 seasons ago his out of date methods took a brick Man Utd squad to 81 points and second (ahead of us)
3 seasons ago it won them the EUROPA league and League cup.
Is it actually fair to declare his methods as "out of date" and make statements like "would they work today"?
"Could he have orchestrated a comeback...." - would his team have been that far behind?
I think views on his teams play are exaggerated by most peoples experience of them being the big games (Im guilty of this). Where he is often decidedly compact/cagey/negative(?) because he will quite happily hunker down for a borefest to get the result.
Most games though, his team score plenty of goals (full seasons).
Porto 02-03 gf73(2) ga26(1) GD+47 - 2nd best goals scored, 1st for least goals conceeded
Porto 03-04 gf63(1) ga19(1) GD+44
Chelsea 04-05 gf72(2) ga15(1) GD+57
Chelsea 05-06 gf72(1) ga22(1) GD+50
Chelsea 06-07 gf64(2) ga24(1) GD+40
Inter 08-09 gf70(1) ga32(1) GD+38
Inter 09-10 gf75(1) ga34(1) GD+41
Madrid 10-11 gf102(1) ga33(2) GD+69 - Outscores Barca
Madrid 11-12 gf121(1) ga32(2) GD+89 - Outscores Barca
Madrid 12-13 gf103(2) ga42(3) GD+61
Chelsea 13-14 gf71(3) ga27(1) GD+44
Chelsea 14-15 gf73(2) ga32(1) GD+41
United 16-17 gf54(8) ga29(2) GD+25
United 17-18 gf68(5) ga28(2) GD+40
I dont think he is a new, up and coming, progressive sort of coach. And I fully understand the appeal of such.
However, I dont think its really fair to declare his methods out of date either.
What about Nayim?He failed at United and you won't find one of their supporters who says otherwise.
2 seasons ago his out of date methods took a brick Man Utd squad to 81 points and second (ahead of us)
3 seasons ago it won them the EUROPA league and League cup.
Is it actually fair to declare his methods as "out of date" and make statements like "would they work today"?
"Could he have orchestrated a comeback...." - would his team have been that far behind?
I think views on his teams play are exaggerated by most peoples experience of them being the big games (Im guilty of this). Where he is often decidedly compact/cagey/negative(?) because he will quite happily hunker down for a borefest to get the result.
Most games though, his team score plenty of goals (full seasons).
Porto 02-03 gf73(2) ga26(1) GD+47 - 2nd best goals scored, 1st for least goals conceeded
Porto 03-04 gf63(1) ga19(1) GD+44
Chelsea 04-05 gf72(2) ga15(1) GD+57
Chelsea 05-06 gf72(1) ga22(1) GD+50
Chelsea 06-07 gf64(2) ga24(1) GD+40
Inter 08-09 gf70(1) ga32(1) GD+38
Inter 09-10 gf75(1) ga34(1) GD+41
Madrid 10-11 gf102(1) ga33(2) GD+69 - Outscores Barca
Madrid 11-12 gf121(1) ga32(2) GD+89 - Outscores Barca
Madrid 12-13 gf103(2) ga42(3) GD+61
Chelsea 13-14 gf71(3) ga27(1) GD+44
Chelsea 14-15 gf73(2) ga32(1) GD+41
United 16-17 gf54(8) ga29(2) GD+25
United 17-18 gf68(5) ga28(2) GD+40
I dont think he is a new, up and coming, progressive sort of coach. And I fully understand the appeal of such.
However, I dont think its really fair to declare his methods out of date either.
He failed at United and you won't find one of their supporters who says otherwise.